Sometime last week I read somewhere that KFC pulled their annoying ad due to accusations of racism. First thought – Yay, I don’t have to put up with it any more. I’m a cricket fan, and watched every match through summer. The ad was annoying the first time they aired it. Couple it with the whole series of ads, and the sheer number of times it airs in a day, and you’ll understand my pain. (Plus I’m against fast food sponsoring sports. I’m also against fast food. Anyways…) Second thought – Yeh, it was off-putting, but I didn’t think it was racist.
Oh, in case you aren’t a cricket fan, and haven’t seen it even once:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SCKUk3SxBI]
Today I saw a tweet by @Mashable – Our most retweeted post right now: “Is This KFC Ad Racist? – and I groaned.
I kinda feel sorry for Australia right now. It’s been on the receiving end of a lot of racism accusations over the past couple of months, some just, others not so in my opinion. (And to everyone who’s been asking – Yes, I’m fine. No, there isn’t more racism here than there is anywhere else.)
So, back to the ad. Some thoughts –
The last two points I find the most troubling. Audiences are global now. We’ve all seen cute/funny/quirky local ads shared on Twitter, forums, Facebook, blogs, via e-mail etc. But if I were making an ad, just how much consideration would I need to give to sentiments of the global audience before I lose all context for my local audience? And is it reasonable to assume that I will be able to avoid the localised rules of the global audience? (I needed an explanation for the racist angle of the KFC ad.)
The ‘global’ audience can only make meaning of a piece of content within their own frames of discourse (the ‘localised rules’ mentioned earlier). Once the meaning is made, is it then reasonable to level accusations of racism and expect others, with their own frames of reference, to defer to their interpretation? Doesn’t that then lead to those with a louder voice being heard more? Swapping different meaning-making references is how we educate each other, but where do we draw the lines between sharing and insisting one is more correct than the other? Should there be lines drawn?
The questions never end, and I have no answers, so I’ll leave it here. The only thing I know is that KFC pulling the ad in Australia worries me more than the ad itself.
Regarding the KFC advert with West Indian fans being offered fried chicken. It’s all getting too politically correct. There’s no intentional offense meant. If an add in India,Jamaica or China had them offering an Aussie a meat pie with sauce…who’d be offended? Some jerks somewhere are just hassling for no reason than to make waves. But as a white Australian male, am I allowed to have my opinion respected? When Israel and Palestine and the middle east stop sucking the world into their cesspit, it might all calm down.
Don’t quite get what you mean. Bit of a stretch to draw a connection to the Middle East, no?
Can you imagine if Saudi Arabia or France took exception to one of their advertisements in the same way?
I wrote my post on the issue here: http://maenad-au.livejournal.com/159783.html
Thanks for sharing Annette. I don’t agree with your interpretation of the ad, but that brings me back to the point about how we call have different meaning-making schemas! 🙂
Yes, bit of a stretch to drag the Middle East into the discussion. I blame the late night/ unable to sleep/ too much booze excuse. I blame everyone else but accept no responsibility for my comments so I guess I could be a politician. Pay’s good.Lack of logic is a part of the job description.